Psychiatric News

A chronicle of human rights violations and crimes by the psychiatric industry

A Psychiatrist’s Point of View

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73SRn1gdAdM
Psych Peter Breggin (psychiatrist) states in this video, “The most dangerous thing you 
can do is take your kids to a psychiatrist”.

October 28, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

The Diseasing of America’s Children…

 

 
Letters to the editor: tblount@hpe.com 
 
High Point Enterprise (North Carolina)
Pediatrician believes ADHD does not exist
By Jimmy Tomlin
Oct 26,2008

HIGH POINT – If there’s such a thing as an “ADHD Establishment,” Dr. Bose Ravenel stands firmly in the anti-establishment camp.

And that badge – he refers to himself as “a rebel with a cause” – is one the 70-year-old High Point pediatrician wears proudly.

“I don’t relish it,” he says, “but it doesn’t bother me because I’m convinced about what we’re doing.”

Ravenel, who has practiced in High Point since 1988, has co-authored a new book – with noted family psychologist John Rosemond – that likely will make him a lightning rod for criticism from the aforementioned ADHD Establishment.

In the book, “The Diseasing of America’s Children: Exposing the ADHD Fiasco and Empowering Parents To Take Back Control” (Thomas Nelson, $24.99), the authors not only hold the ADHD Establishment’s feet to the fire – they toss the establishment into the fire, using such pointed phrases as “a travesty of science,” “flimsy evidence,” “a scandal waiting to erupt,” and “an effort that has resulted in the manufacture of diseases that do not exist.”

Specifically, the authors contend that those “diseases that do not exist” – namely, ADD (attention-deficit disorder), ADHD (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) and ODD (oppositional defiant disorder) – are based on bad science, most likely do not derive from a genetic brain disorder, and therefore do not require potentially harmful medications for treatment.

They further contend that the classic ADHD symptoms such as inattention, forgetfulness, inability to focus, hyperactivity and impulsivity can be addressed through a behavioral treatment model rather than resorting to drugs.

“We believe the professional literature is skewed in the direction of overstating the effect of medications on these children and understating the potential harmful effects,” Ravenel explains.

Ironically, Ravenel admits he’s a former member of the ADHD Establishment.

“That’s why I don’t blame them, because I was there with them,” he says. “I never knew any different. As a busy doctor, you tend to read the journals that are published by authors who have heavy pharmaceutical company ties, so you’re not aware of this whole alternative perspective.”

About seven or eight years ago, though, Ravenel says he began to question the alarming rate at which children were being diagnosed with ADHD, particularly considering the absence of the disease in previous generations.

“That got me to begin looking seriously at those rare individuals who would write articles suggesting that ADHD is not real – I looked at why they said that,” Ravenel recalls.

His conclusion? ADHD is B-O-G-U-S.

Ravenel and Rosemond argue in their book that in the 30-plus years since ADHD was recognized as a behavior disorder, no objective diagnostic criteria have been developed; no ADHD gene has been discovered; and no ADHD biochemical imbalance has been quantified.

“We don’t believe there’s any evidence to support (ADHD’s existence), and there’s a compelling amount of evidence to support what we’re proposing,” Ravenel says. “We think everybody ought to be trying this alternative first.”

Ravenel’s primary concern, he says, is the longterm impact of ADHD medications such as Ritalin, Concerta and Adderall.

“Even establishment members would agree that no one knows what the effects of longterm exposure to these psychotropic drugs would be,” he says.

The authors recommend a four-prong behavioral approach in lieu of medication:

• Reframe the child’s self-image from that of a person with a disabled brain to one with great potential. That can be done, they say, through an old-fashioned parenting approach that combines “powerful love and powerful discipline.”

• Eliminate or restrict the child’s exposure to electronic media such as TV, video games and computers. “Children get addicted to these electronic stimuli,” Ravenel says.

• Change the child’s diet from the typical American diet of fast food, processed carbohydrates and sugars to more healthy foods. Also, fish oil supplements have been shown to benefit learning and behavior, Ravenel says.

• De-emphasize the current educational trend that requires kindergartners to learn what once wasn’t learned until first grade, because that trend causes more children to struggle and fail.

This approach has made believers out of numerous parents who have brought their children to Ravenel’s practice at Cornerstone Pediatrics, he says.

“If you talk to parents whose children were faced with the prospect of their child being on medication for the rest of their life, and then within just a few weeks or months the problem is solved, they get really passionate,” Ravenel says. “And they can’t believe other parents are not being exposed to the same idea.”

Link to story:   http://hpe.southernheadlines.com/index.cfm?section=8&story=5371

October 27, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Zoloft – Drug Regulator Now in Firing Sights

From: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24555957-2702,00.htmlMother settles landmark case over Zoloft

From The Australian

Australia’s national newspaper

Julie-Anne Davies | October 27, 2008

THE Victorian mother who launched an unprecedented lawsuit against her 16-year-old daughter’s GP claiming her child became suicidal after being prescribed the anti-depressant drug Zoloft has reached a confidential legal settlement with the doctor.

In a case believed to be the first of its kind in Australia, Nicola Mulcahy lodged a $95,000 claim for her own economic loss in the Melbourne Magistrates Court under the Fair Trading Act after she was forced to quit her job to take care of her daughter Hannah. “I am happy it’s all over but I am unable to say anything further,” Ms Mulcahy said.

She is now considering mounting a class action against Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, on the grounds it failed to properly warn consumers and prescribers of the risks posed by anti-depressants. In her statement of claim against Vanessa Haller, Ms Mulcahy said the GP misrepresented and falsely promoted Zoloft, an SSRI anti-depressant as a safe, effective and approved drug for children.

Ms Mulcahy’s daughter attempted suicide five days after being prescribed Zoloft. Several other attempts followed. She spent five weeks at the Royal Children’s Hospital adolescent psychiatric unit. Ms Mulcahy said her daughter was later diagnosed with a genetic defect that predisposed her to having an adverse reaction to the active ingredient in Zoloft.

In her claim, Ms Mulcahy said she did not give informed consent because the serious side-effects associated with the drug were not explained.

The lawyer acting for Dr Haller refused to comment on the settlement.

October 27, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Lilly to ‘Settle’ in Criminal Investigation

Pharmalot
Lilly to Take 1.4 Billion Charge for Zyprexa Probe
By Ed Silverman

money1

The drugmaker is in “advanced discussions” to settle a long-standing criminal investigation into its marketing of the antipsychotic. The disclosure comes just two weeks after Lilly settled an 18-month probe with 32 states, which contended Lilly violated consumer protection laws by urging docs to prescribe Zyprexa to patients who did not need the drug (back story).

Today, Lilly says it has “incorporate an enhanced compliance program,” which includes guidelines issued by the US Department of Health and Human Service’s Office of Inspector General. “The government’s investigation…has been ongoing for five years and we now have a heightened sense of responsibility to all our stakeholders to intensify efforts to resolve these issues,” Robert Armitage, Lilly’s senior vp and general counsel, says in a statement.

The investigation by the US Attorney in Philadelphia began in 2004 and last November, Lilly received a grand jury subpoena. Meanwhile, the State Medicaid Fraud Control Units of more than 30 states coordinated its investigation with the feds into Medicaid-related claims concerning Zyprexa marketing. However, 11 other states – Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, Connecticut, Arkansas and Idaho – have filed lawsuits over Zyprexa and are not participating in the coordinated probe.

In its statement, Lilly says that, if the ongoing discussions are successfully concluded, the drugmaker expects that they would settle the Zyprexa-related federal claims, as well as similar Medicaid-related claims of states participating in the settlement. Separately, Lilly paid $15 million to settle a lawsuit last March filed by the state of Alaska (see here).

Lilly, however, continues to face a potential class-action lawsuit by third-party payors in federal court in New York (back story) and the presiding judge has urged the drugmaker to settle those cases or possibly face racketeering charges.

Link: http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/lilly-to-take-14-billion-charge-for-zyprexa-probe/






 

Video - Too many kids on meds? 
 

27,567 Signatures Against TeenScreen. Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/TScreen/petition.html  

October 22, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Drug Company Bribes to Doctors to be Banned

Your CCHR Florida membership can be obtained here: http://www.cchrflorida.org/membership.html


“psychiatrists earn more money from drug makers than doctors in any other specialty … For instance, the more psychiatrists have earned from drug makers, the more they have prescribed a new class of powerful medicines known as atypical antipsychotics to children, for whom the drugs are especially risky and mostly unapproved.” -  New York Times, June 27, 2007,  Psychiatrists Top List in Drug Maker Gifts

Minnesota, Wisconsin and other states are cracking down on gifts to doctors.  What about your state?

You could ask your state’s psychiatric society and medical society if they have plans to ban gifts to all doctors.  You can find contact info here:  
State Psychiatric Societies: http://onlineapa.psych.org/listing/
 

Minnesota Star Tribune
U Medical School plan: Ban all gifts to doctors

By JANET MOORE, Star Tribune
October 21, 2008

The University of Minnesota Medical School is considering a new conflict-of-interest policy so strict that doctors wouldn’t even be able to accept Post-it Notes bearing a drug company’s logo.

The far-reaching policy, which if enacted would be among the toughest in the nation, comes as congressional investigators and the U.S. Justice Department are probing ties between doctors and drug companies and medical device manufacturers — probes that have raised some difficult questions for the university.

The Medical School’s proposed policy digs deep and reaches far into the entrenched relationship between the drug and medical device industries and the university’s doctors, researchers and students, as well as the institution itself. If adopted, the policy would profoundly alter the relationship between industry and the state’s largest medical school.

All personal gifts from industry would be banned. Free drug samples would be limited. Industry support for doctors’ continuing medical education would be phased out. Doctors’ consulting relationships would be disclosed to both patients and the public. Those financial ties would be monitored far more closely.

“It’s really putting policies in place that would, as best as possible, ensure the patient’s best interest,” said Dr. Leo Furcht, co-chairman of the task force recommending the rules and chairman of the U’s Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology.

A draft of the proposed policy was presented to Medical School Dean Deborah Powell last month and subsequently distributed to the school’s faculty for comment. That process will likely wrap up by the end of the semester. It’s unclear whether approval by the university’s Board of Regents will be required. Either way, Furcht said the reaction so far has been mixed.

“Many people have said, ‘This is something we have to do,’ there are some who feel [the policy] has gone a little too far, and some who feel it isn’t enough,” he said.

Link to story: http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/31435329.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUJ

 


 

The Capital Times
Wisconsin group bars doctors from accepting gifts
Associated Press
10/16/2008
 
The largest association of medical doctors in Wisconsin is barring its members from accepting gifts from drug companies, following a national trend to limit conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
 
The ban includes the most common gifts to doctors such as food, mugs and pens, as well as reimbursements for travel, the Wisconsin Medical Society said in a statement released Thursday.
 
“A complete ban eases the burdens of compliance, biased decision-making, and patient distrust,” reads the new policy, which was approved Saturday.
 
Drug companies generally say the gifts are too minor to influence a doctor’s prescribing habits, and emphasize that they demand strict ethical standards from their sales representatives.
 
But industry observers, including the editors from a number of top medical journals, say the influence is subtle but measurable. They point to research that suggests doctors are more susceptible to drug pitches when freebies are involved.
 
In the last few years dozens of medical schools and medical-specialty societies have begun barring gifts to doctors and limiting their other financial ties to industry representatives.
 
The new policy of the Wisconsin Medical Society was meant to give guidance to its 12,000 members, not to condemn any specific group or industry, said Society President Steven Bergin.
 
“There’s nothing more sacred than the physician-patient relationship,” he said, “and we physicians have the responsibility to make sure nothing gets in the way of that relationship — or even appears to get in the way.”
 
 





 

Video - Too many kids on meds? 
 

27,567 Signatures Against TeenScreen. Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/TScreen/petition.html    
 

October 22, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Irish Government Covers Up ECT Statistics


 

 

NEWSLETTER

State agencies collude to cover up extent of ECT use

In an article in the current issue of the Irish Medical Times, Dr Michael Corry shows how two statutory bodies and the Inspector of Mental Health have ceased recording statistics on the use of electroconvulsive therapy in mental hospitals or units, are covering up the extent of its use and abuse, and are hindering researchers who seek to study this area in Ireland.

The article studies all the annual reports of the Mental Health Commission since its establishment in 2002, the reports of the Inspector of Mental Health, and the previous practice under the Health Research Board, which has since abandoned all research in this field. It also lists many instances of dubious practice in recording visits to mental hospitals.

The Wellbeing Foundation has republished this article on its website at www.wellbeingfoundation.com/opinion2.html. It has also published a contribution to the debate on ECT by eminent neuroscientist Professor Peter Sterling, who demonstrates conclusively both the short- and long-term damage caused to patients by the administration of ECT. See www.wellbeingfoundation.com/sterling.html

Since 21 June 2008 the abolition of ECT has become a human rights issue, when a private members bill was debated for two hours in Seanad Eireann. It was proposed by Green party senators Deirdre de Burca and Dan Boyle, and the Independent senator David Norris. Since the debate inspired by this Bill began, most institutional psychiatrists in Ireland have claimed that their profession is united in advocating ECT and have rejected accusations that it damages mental and intellectual functioning in several serious ways. This is simply not true: their profession, at least elsewhere, is seriously divided on this issue and cannot agree either on the efficacy of ECT or its serious effects. 

Now we show that no evidence is being recorded by the responsible statutory bodies to allow policy-makers and legislators to make a judgment on the use of ECT. 
    
In such circumstances, the politicians who will shortly return to the debate on the three senators’ Bill to ban involuntary electroshock must prioritise the political, ethical and human rights aspects of the current ECT regime in our mental health system and avoid the medical debate.
    
With no evidence of either use or misuse being collected by those the legislature charged with this responsibility, the issue should be decided on one criterion — do current rules on the administration of ECT conform even to the minimum standards required to uphold the human rights of the patient? The answer to this is clearly NO — and on that basis, and that basis alone, the senators’ Bill should be passed into law.

In the meantime, the Minister of State with responsibility for mental health, John Maloney, must suspend the use of ECT until this cover-up is ended and a proper regime of gathering evidence is re-instituted.



****************************
The Wellbeing Foundation is publishing a great deal of material on ECT in order to inform this debate. Visit our website to download this material. 

Supporters can also download the e-mail addresses of all government ministers, TDs and Senators via the Wellbeing website. Please do take advantage of this facility to write emails to all members of Government and the Legislature demanding that the use of ECT be suspended until the information black hole is ended, and to demand that the Private Members’ Bill to end forced ECT and lobotomy is accepted by the Government and passed into law as soon as possible.

**************************

Dr Corry’s article and Professor Sterling’s paper can be downloaded from the home page of our website.

www.wellbeingfoundation.com

October 22, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

NJ Senator Joe Vitale-The Dark Side of Congress

Is Informed Consent A Good Idea? 

 

Vote Yes and make comments here: http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-informed-consent-bill-stymied-by-senator/#comment-378094

 

 

Pharmalot

NJ Informed Consent Bill Stymied By Senator

By Ed Silverman

October 15th, 2008

 

 

NJ Senator Joe Vitale – blocking informed consent bill  – refuses to come to phone 

Three years ago, the FDA required makers of antidepressants to supply Med Guides along with their pills. That wasn’t good enough for a couple of New Jersey moms, who have been pushing their state legislature to go further – a bill requiring a doctor or nurse to obtain informed consent from a minor’s parent before writing a prescription for any psychotropic that already carries a Black Box warning.

In fact, thanks to their urgings, a bill has been kicking around the state legislature for nearly two years and passed the assembly. However, the state senator who heads the Senate health committee, Joe Vitale, has repeatedly failed to schedule the bill for a vote (here’s the bill and the assembly version). Last fall, he told us the bill would move forward, but it never did. And Vitale has failed to schedule the bill for a vote tomorrow, when the committee will hold its next meeting.

His opposition has frustrated the bill’s sponsor, State Senator Shirley Turner. “When there are serious or severe side effects with some of the medicines being prescribed, a parent has the right to know what those side effects may be. Many times you get literature with the medication that describes possible side effects, but sometimes people don’t read them. This would be an extra precautionary step,” she tells us. “Information is power and we need to empower parents with all available information when it comes to drug prescriptions for their children.”

One of the moms is, not surprisingly, upset. “This bill is about ensuring that parents or guardians, who are the primary monitors of a child’s reaction to this category of drugs, have the information provided by the FDA ‘Black Box’ warning,” says Laurie Yorke, who also happens to be a nurse. “They need to be aware that problematic behavior may be directly related to the drugs use.”

For his part, Vitale refuses to come to the phone to explain his decision. Do contributions from drugmakers have anything to do with it? Vitale gets money from lots of sources, so you can speculate yourself by gazing at his lists of contributors. Meanwhile, what do you think? 

Go here: http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/10/nj-informed-consent-bill-stymied-by-senator/#comment-378094

October 16, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Psychiatric Prison System-Victoria, Australia

The government of the State of Victoria in Australia runs a psychiatric prison system.   You can be imprisoned on the say so of a couple of psychiatrists and kept there indefinitely.  You can be, and many are, subjected to the most appalling and unusual practices which a more civilized state would instantly recognize as torture.  

The prisoner has no recourse.  The prisoner has no hope.  The media turn a blind eye as it is an uncomfortable subject area.  The parents can only write letters such as the one below.  Human Rights are completely ignored in Victoria, Australia

 

The Hon. Lisa Neville

Minister for Mental Health.

 

We want our son Garth Daniels to be immediately discharged into our care.

He has committed no crime nor has he any conviction against him.

He was transferred from the Alfred Hospital on Wednesday afternoon

In response to a protest calling for his release from hospital.

We want his immediate discharge from the Thomas Embling Prison Hospital

INTO OUR IMMEDIATE CARE.

 

Bernard & Marilyn DANIELS

Guardian & parents of Garth

October 12, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

Child Drugging Smashed

Make a tax deductible donation to CCHR Florida today . Go here: http://www.cchrflorida.org/membership.html

#1 Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73SRn1gdAdM   8-1/2 minutes 

#2 Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcvCtxaiOGg   7-1/2 minutes 
 

Your Turn with Kathy Fountain – Weekdays on Tampa FOX 13 

Thursday, October 9, 2008
Topic:     Too many kids on meds?
Guests:   Peter Breggin, M.D. author Medication Madness
                Bruce Levine, Ph.D.   Psychologist
                Dominick Riccio, Ph.D. Psychologist 
                James B. Gottstein, attorney  

 


27,529 Signatures Against TeenScreen. Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/TScreen/petition.html    

October 11, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet

New Zealand Acts Against Big Pharma

Antipsychotic drugs also known as “psychiatric chemical lobotomies” 
You can see the FDA black box warning on “newer” antipsychotics here: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Atypical_Antipsychotics/files/
 
They are not FDA approved for “dementia” in the elderly.
 
Otago Daily Times (New Zealand)
Pharmac acts over concerns at high use of antipsychotics

News: National
7 Oct 2008

Concern overseas about the high use of antipsychotic medicines in the elderly has prompted government drug buying agency Pharmac and the College of Psychiatrists to release new usage guidelines here.

Concern has been expressed in the United States and Britain that high usage of antipsychotics in the elderly carries potential health risks including possible increased risk of stroke and higher death rates.

While it was unclear whether there was significant over-prescribing of antipsychotics in New Zealand, Pharmac’s prescribing data showed there was comparatively high use of antipsychotics among older people.

In 2006/07 about 20 percent of older-generation antipsychotics, 24 percent of risperidone [risperdal] and 17 percent of quetiapine [seroquel] prescriptions were for people aged between 80 and 90.

About 35,000 prescriptions were recorded for people aged 80-90.

“When this data is coupled with growing international concern about the use of antipsychotics in the elderly, we think it’s the right time to develop guidance on how best to use these medicines,” Pharmac’s medical director Peter Moodie said.

“This isn’t about telling doctors how to do their jobs, it’s about ensuring these medicines are used well and risks to patients are minimised.”

Dr Moodie said the guidance encouraged evidence-based treatment of elderly people in residential care with psychological and behavioural symptoms of mental disorders.

Dementia was the most common psychiatric disorder in that sector of people.

Link to story: http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/26079/pharmac-acts-over-concerns-high-use-antipsychotics


27,529 Signatures Against TeenScreen. Petition: http://www.petitiononline.com/TScreen/petition.html    

 

October 9, 2008 Posted by Philip Barton | Blogroll | | No Comments Yet